|
Post by nodstar on Oct 15, 2009 2:35:53 GMT 4
Jordan to refill shrinking Dead Sea with salt water[/size] Telegraph Media Group www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/6285055/Jordan-to-refill-shrinking-Dead-Sea-with-salt-water.html2009-10-12 Jordan is to refill the shrinking Dead Sea with salt water despite concerns from environmentalists about the threat to its unique eco-system. Water levels in the lowest and saltiest body of water on the planet are falling by more than four feet a year, giving rise to quips that the Dead Sea is dying. The government in Amman has said it is planning to extract more than 10 billion cubic feet a year from the Red Sea 110 miles to the south, feed most of it into a desalination plant to create drinking water, and send the salty waste-water left over to the Dead Sea by tunnel. Similar plans are already the subject of a two-year feasibility study agreed by the Jordanians, Israelis and Palestinians in a rare example of cross-border Middle East co-operation. But the Jordanians have decided they cannot wait any longer. "Jordan will start with the first phase with the help of donor countries and private investors," its minister for water, General Maysoun Zu'bi, said this week. But environmentalists said the two years allotted to the feasibility study were already too short for a proper assessment of the risks posed to the Dead Sea's unique ecology. Environmentalists are concerned that the mixing of two different types of salt-water might have serious ecological consequences, including a build-up of algae. There are allied plans to build up the Dead Sea's roads and hotels for tourism. There are also fears that increased salinity in the Red Sea might damage fish and coral. "We know the plan's attractive to the Jordanian government because it will bring so much money circulating in the economy," said Munqeth Mehyar, director of Friends of the Earth in the Jordanian capital, Amman. "But the price is too high." The study for the so-called "Red-Dead Water Conveyance Project", funded by seven donor nations and commissioned by the World Bank, is examining the economic and environmental impact of building the world's biggest desalination plant, running on hydroelectric power. As well as replenishing water levels in the Dead Sea it would fulfil Jordan's estimated need for drinking water for half a century and supplement supplies for the Israelis and Palestinians, who live on its other side. The Sea, already the lowest point on earth's land-mass, has dropped by 98 feet in 20 years, and its surface area has shrunk by a third. A recent study showed that the rate of disappearance was increasing as more water was extracted from its feeder source, the River Jordan, by all three authorities for drinking, agriculture and industry. The Jordanians claim that their own plan, at present more modest, does not contradict the larger proposals being studied. They have called it the Jordan National Red Sea Water Development Project and say it can "benefit from" the feasibility study. It will start next year, at a cost of an estimated USD2 billion, compared with the USD11 billion cost of the full scheme. But Gen Zu'bi admitted that it could be considered "the first phase of the Red-Dead project". The decision to go ahead in advance of the study's findings are said to have upset the Palestinians, though General Zu'bi denied this. Jean-Pierre Chabal, vice-president of Coyne et Bellier, the French firm carrying out the study, said it was "paradoxical" that it might conclude that the scheme was unworkable after the project had effectively already begun. "They say they want to use the study but also to go faster than the study," he said. "It is not clear to us how this can be, and I don't think it is clear to the World Bank either."
|
|
|
Post by nodstar on Oct 15, 2009 2:38:19 GMT 4
Scientists identify bacterium that helps in formation of gold[/size] Discovery Online www.discoveryon.info/2009/10/scientists-identify-bacterium.html2009-10-11 Australian scientists have found that the bacterium Cupriavidus metallidurans catalyses the biomineralisation of gold by transforming toxic gold compounds to their metallic form using active cellular mechanism. According to Frank Reith, leader of the research and working at the University of Adelaide, “A number of years ago we discovered that the metal-resistant bacterium Cupriavidus metallidurans occurred on gold grains from two sites in Australia. “The sites are 3500 km apart, in southern New South Wales and northern Queensland, so when we found the same organism on grains from both sites we thought we were onto something,” he said. “It made us wonder why these organisms live in this particular environment. The results of this study point to their involvement in the active detoxification of Au complexes leading to formation of gold biominerals,” he added. The experiments showed that C. metallidurans rapidly accumulates toxic gold complexes from a solution prepared in the lab. This process promotes gold toxicity, which pushes the bacterium to induce oxidative stress and metal resistance clusters as well as an as yet uncharacterized Au-specific gene cluster in order to defend its cellular integrity. This leads to active biochemically-mediated reduction of gold complexes to nano-particulate, metallic gold, which may contribute to the growth of gold nuggets. By determining what elements there are, scientists can see where the gold is located in relation to the cells. For this study, scientists combined synchrotron techniques at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) and the Advanced Photon Source (APS) and molecular microbial techniques to understand the biomineralisation in bacteria. It is the first time that these techniques have been used in the same study, so Frank Reith brought together a multinational team of experts in both areas for the success of the experiment. This is the first direct evidence that bacteria are actively involved in the cycling of rare and precious metals, such as gold. These results open the doors to the production of biosensors. “The discovery of an Au-specific operon means that we can now start to develop gold-specific biosensors, which will help mineral explorers to find new gold deposits,” said Reith.
|
|
|
Post by emeraldsun on Oct 16, 2009 3:16:33 GMT 4
'Magnetic electricity' discovered (sniip) In September this year, two research groups independently reported the existence of monopoles - "particles" which carry an overall magnetic charge. But they exist only in the spin ice crystals. These crystals are made up of pyramids of charged atoms, or ions, arranged in such a way that when cooled to exceptionally low temperatures, the materials show tiny, discrete packets of magnetic charge. The loops of a magnetic field can be seen in the arrangement of iron filings Now one of those teams has gone on to show that these "quasi-particles" of magnetic charge can move together, forming a magnetic current just like the electric current formed by moving electrons. They did so by using sub-atomic particles called muons, created at the Science and Technology Facilities Council's (STFC) ISIS neutron and muon source near Oxford. The muons decay millionths of a second after their production into other sub-atomic particles. But the direction in which these resulting particles fly off is an indicator of the magnetic field in a tiny region around the muons. news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8307804.stm
|
|
|
Post by emeraldsun on Oct 16, 2009 3:25:48 GMT 4
Bug barcode readers hold out promise of universal vaccinesVeterinary scientists have made a discovery that promises to deliver a new approach to fast development of cheap vaccines that are effective in all mammals – not just humans or another particular species. They propose that by harnessing the system that reads the biological ‘barcodes’ of infectious microbes such as food poisoning bacteria, flu viruses and protozoa that cause malaria, one vaccine could be made to prevent a particular disease in all mammals. The research is discussed in the new Autumn edition of Business, the quarterly magazine of the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC). The scientists, led by Professor David Haig, University of Nottingham, Dr Tracey Coffey and Dr Jayne Hope, Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Professor Dirk Werling, Royal Veterinary College London and Dr Elizabeth Glass and Dr Oliver Jann, The Roslin Institute, have used a 'one medicine' approach, which recognises that many diseases and immune system response are common across different species and removes the largely artificial distinction between humans and other animals. This approach can be particularly powerful when investigating zoonoses - diseases that jump the species barrier. Researcher Professor Dirk Werling from the Royal Veterinary College, said: “Vaccines that are effective in several species are entirely feasible and could potentially be cost effective. Since any vaccine can be difficult and expensive to develop and manufacture, it would be desirable to really hone the effectiveness of a single vaccine so that it can be used in a variety of circumstances. What we have found is something that could be used to adapt one vaccine to many mammals. “There are very subtle differences according to species, or even geographical location, in the system that alerts the immune system of a mammal to harmful bacteria, viruses and other threats. This is down to tiny variations in how animals have evolved alongside these threats and manifests as slightly different forms of a type of molecule called a toll-like receptor or TLR. TLR’s work like a barcode reader to identify a particular threat to the health of an animal and give the immune system the information it needs to respond and in this way are very important to determining the success of vaccination. Local differences in this system in humans might partly explain the variable success rate of tuberculosis vaccination programmes around the world.” One way to make a good vaccine even more effective is to accompany it with a “helper substance”, known as an adjuvant. Professor Werling continued: “We already know that molecules that interact with TLRs make very good vaccine adjuvants and with the knowledge we have gained about species and geographical variations, we have the ability to use these strategically.” Professor Janet Allen, BBSRC Director of Research said: “When we embark on research to understand the fundamental workings of something as complicated as the immune system of mammals, we really don’t know what gems we might discover. To be able to maintain the health of people and animals using one single vaccine would be a great development and shows that there is value in understanding the basic biology of how things work. “There are infections by microbes such as Salmonella, E.coli and Campylobacter that can occur in many species and cause a significant risk to health and having a ‘one medicine’ approach to preventing and treating these can really only be a good thing.” full article here: www.bbsrc.ac.uk/publications/business/2009/autumn/feature_local_evolutionary_clues_to_global_vaccine_design.html
|
|
|
Post by emeraldsun on Oct 16, 2009 3:33:31 GMT 4
Plants may not have eyes and ears, but they can recognize their siblings, and researchers at the University of Delaware have discovered how.The ID system lies in the roots and the chemical cues they secrete. The finding not only sheds light on the intriguing sensing system in plants, but also may have implications for agriculture and even home gardening. The study, which is reported in the scientific journal Communicative & Integrative Biology, was led by Harsh Bais, assistant professor of plant and soil sciences at the University of Delaware. Canadian researchers published in 2007 that sea rocket, a common seashore plant, can recognize its siblings -- plants grown from seeds from the same mother. Susan Dudley, an evolutionary plant ecologist at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, and her colleagues observed that when siblings are grown next to each other in the soil, they “play nice” and don't send out more roots to compete with one another. However, the moment one of the plants is thrown in with strangers, it begins competing with them by rapidly growing more roots to take up the water and mineral nutrients in the soil. Bais, who has conducted a variety of research on plant signaling systems, read Dudley's study and wanted to find the mechanism behind the sibling recognition. “Plants have no visible sensory markers, and they can't run away from where they are planted,” Bais says. “It then becomes a search for more complex patterns of recognition.” Working in his laboratory at the Delaware Biotechnology Institute, a major center for life sciences research at UD, Bais and doctoral student Meredith Biedrzycki set up a study with wild populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. They utilized wild populations to avoid issues with this common laboratory-bred species, which “always has cousins floating around in the lab,” Bais says. In a series of experiments, young seedlings were exposed to liquid media containing the root secretions or “exudates” from siblings, from strangers (non-siblings), or only their own exudates. The length of the longest lateral root and of the hypocotyl, the first leaf-like structure that forms on the plant, were measured. Additionally, in one experiment, the root exudates were inhibited by sodium orthovanadate, which specifically blocks root secretions without imparting adverse growth effects on roots. www.udel.edu/udaily/2010/oct/plantsiblings101409.html
|
|
|
Post by papat on Oct 16, 2009 6:03:24 GMT 4
Could the Large Hadron Collider be held back by its own future? [/size] Telegraph Media Group www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/6318034/Could-the-Large-Hadron-Collider-be-held-back-by-its-own-future.html2009-10-14 The much-delayed and maligned Large Hadron Collider has been hit by its most outlandish claim to date - it is being sabotaged by its own future. Forget the far-fetched belief that it will create a black hole, two distinguished physicists have gone even further claiming nature itself is stopping the troubled £4.4billion project from getting off the ground. In a theory reminiscent of the time travelling film Back to the Future, the theoretical physicists Holger Nielsen, from Denmark, and Masao Ninomiya, from Japan, have concluded that its discoveries could be so "abhorrent to nature" that they are coming back to stop their own creation. They have outlined their thoughts in a series of papers with titles like “Test of Effect From Future in Large Hadron Collider: a Proposal” and “Search for Future Influence From LHC.” The pair's hypothesis centres around the Higgs Boson, a mysterious tiny particle and building block of life that it is hoped the LHC will discover. They have come up with a theory that it will "ripple backward through time" and stop the collider before it could make one, like a time traveler who goes back in time to kill his grandfather. "It must be our prediction that all Higgs producing machines shall have bad luck,” Dr. Nielsen said. He said that his theories may even provide a "model for God" who "rather hates Higgs particles, and attempts to avoid them”. The world's biggest and most complex experiment to date, the LHC has taken 10,000 researchers more than 15 years to build. Eventually it is hoped that by firing particles around a 17-mile underground tunnel near Geneva, it can recreate conditions that existed fractions of a second after the Big Bang. At the same scientists hope to locate a mysterious particle known as the Higgs Boson or God Particle which gives everything its mass. But the whole project has been beset by controversy and technical failures. First scientists claimed it would create a black hole that would devour the world and then in September 2008 circuits in one of the magnets overheated causing damage and leading to a helium leak. Now just as it is about to be switched on again, the theoretical physicists have thrown time travel into the mix.[/quote] I found this to be most interesting. I remember when the LHC was about to start up and some of the population was all a buzzz that the end of the world was near. Time travelers Hmmmmmm What if a particular time traveler already knew what would happen, told someone, and that someone would have warned us if it would/could go wrong. After all, we were warned of what would happen if the LG's were not shut down, and we were warned of a certain catastrophe is we humans didn't get our act together. (picture posted in hideway )) I am left wondering if LHC was part of Fulcaneli double "C", unfortunately the bad behavior by some in Zurich never let the Drs. explain Fulcaneli. Excellent article thanks for posting Peace Papa T
|
|
|
Post by galaxygirl on Oct 16, 2009 22:31:58 GMT 4
SOLAR SYSTEM'S EDGE SURPRISES ASTRONOMERS New observations reveal a dense ribbon structure that current models don’t explain By Ron Cowen Web edition : Thursday, October 15th, 2009The edge of the solar system is tied up with a ribbon, astronomers have discovered. The first global map of the solar system reveals that its edge is nothing like what had been predicted. Neutral atoms, which are the only way to image the fringes of the solar system, are densely packed into a narrow ribbon rather than evenly distributed. “Our maps show structure and energy spectra that are completely different from what any model has predicted,” says study coauthor Herbert Funsten of the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. NASA’s Interstellar Boundary Explorer satellite, or IBEX, discovered the narrow ribbon, which completes nearly a full circle across the sky. The density of neutral atoms in the band is two to three times that in adjacent regions. These and related findings, reported in six papers posted online October 15 in Science, will not only send theorists back to the drawing board, researchers say, but may ultimately provide new insight on the interaction between the heliosphere — the vast bubble in which the solar system resides — and surrounding space. The bubble is inflated by solar wind, the high-speed stream of charged particles blowing out from the sun to the solar system’s very edge. For 48 years, researchers have assumed that the solar wind sculpted the structure at the heliosphere’s boundary with interstellar space, says Tom Krimigis of Johns Hopkins University’s Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Md.. But the newly found ribbon’s orientation suggests that the galaxy’s magnetic field, just outside the heliosphere, seems to be the chief organizer of structure in this region, says theorist Nathan Schwadron of Boston University, a lead author of one of the studies. It’s not known whether the ribbon lasts for just a few years or is a permanent feature. more at: www.sciencenews.org/index/generic/activity/view/id/48456/title/Solar_systems_edge_surprises_astronomers
|
|
|
Post by nodstar on Oct 17, 2009 3:02:45 GMT 4
SOLAR SYSTEM'S EDGE SURPRISES ASTRONOMERS New observations reveal a dense ribbon structure that current models don’t explain By Ron Cowen Web edition : Thursday, October 15th, 2009The edge of the solar system is tied up with a ribbon, astronomers have discovered. The first global map of the solar system reveals that its edge is nothing like what had been predicted. Neutral atoms, which are the only way to image the fringes of the solar system, are densely packed into a narrow ribbon rather than evenly distributed. “Our maps show structure and energy spectra that are completely different from what any model has predicted,” says study coauthor Herbert Funsten of the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. NASA’s Interstellar Boundary Explorer satellite, or IBEX, discovered the narrow ribbon, which completes nearly a full circle across the sky. The density of neutral atoms in the band is two to three times that in adjacent regions. These and related findings, reported in six papers posted online October 15 in Science, will not only send theorists back to the drawing board, researchers say, but may ultimately provide new insight on the interaction between the heliosphere — the vast bubble in which the solar system resides — and surrounding space. The bubble is inflated by solar wind, the high-speed stream of charged particles blowing out from the sun to the solar system’s very edge. For 48 years, researchers have assumed that the solar wind sculpted the structure at the heliosphere’s boundary with interstellar space, says Tom Krimigis of Johns Hopkins University’s Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Md.. But the newly found ribbon’s orientation suggests that the galaxy’s magnetic field, just outside the heliosphere, seems to be the chief organizer of structure in this region, says theorist Nathan Schwadron of Boston University, a lead author of one of the studies. It’s not known whether the ribbon lasts for just a few years or is a permanent feature. more at: www.sciencenews.org/index/generic/activity/view/id/48456/title/Solar_systems_edge_surprises_astronomers Hiya Galaxygirl .. This is a really interesting discovery .. The thing that instantly came to mind for me.. was this I've been studying the images from the so called "Lost Book of Nostradamus" in almost every image there is a RIBBON, and this image of the ribbon is slightly different on each page .. These ribbons have baffled me in terms of symbolism for some time . I can't help wondering of the ribbons represented on those images are the same as the one the scientists from NASA have just discovered .. hmmmmm Just some thoughts .. ;D Thanks for posting that GG Lotsa love Nod
|
|
|
Post by nodstar on Oct 17, 2009 6:13:33 GMT 4
Could the Large Hadron Collider be held back by its own future? [/size] Telegraph Media Group www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/6318034/Could-the-Large-Hadron-Collider-be-held-back-by-its-own-future.html2009-10-14 The much-delayed and maligned Large Hadron Collider has been hit by its most outlandish claim to date - it is being sabotaged by its own future. Forget the far-fetched belief that it will create a black hole, two distinguished physicists have gone even further claiming nature itself is stopping the troubled £4.4billion project from getting off the ground. In a theory reminiscent of the time travelling film Back to the Future, the theoretical physicists Holger Nielsen, from Denmark, and Masao Ninomiya, from Japan, have concluded that its discoveries could be so "abhorrent to nature" that they are coming back to stop their own creation. They have outlined their thoughts in a series of papers with titles like “Test of Effect From Future in Large Hadron Collider: a Proposal” and “Search for Future Influence From LHC.” The pair's hypothesis centres around the Higgs Boson, a mysterious tiny particle and building block of life that it is hoped the LHC will discover. They have come up with a theory that it will "ripple backward through time" and stop the collider before it could make one, like a time traveler who goes back in time to kill his grandfather. "It must be our prediction that all Higgs producing machines shall have bad luck,” Dr. Nielsen said. He said that his theories may even provide a "model for God" who "rather hates Higgs particles, and attempts to avoid them”. The world's biggest and most complex experiment to date, the LHC has taken 10,000 researchers more than 15 years to build. Eventually it is hoped that by firing particles around a 17-mile underground tunnel near Geneva, it can recreate conditions that existed fractions of a second after the Big Bang. At the same scientists hope to locate a mysterious particle known as the Higgs Boson or God Particle which gives everything its mass. But the whole project has been beset by controversy and technical failures. First scientists claimed it would create a black hole that would devour the world and then in September 2008 circuits in one of the magnets overheated causing damage and leading to a helium leak. Now just as it is about to be switched on again, the theoretical physicists have thrown time travel into the mix.[/quote] I found this to be most interesting. I remember when the LHC was about to start up and some of the population was all a buzzz that the end of the world was near. Time travelers Hmmmmmm What if a particular time traveler already knew what would happen, told someone, and that someone would have warned us if it would/could go wrong. After all, we were warned of what would happen if the LG's were not shut down, and we were warned of a certain catastrophe is we humans didn't get our act together. (picture posted in hideway )) I am left wondering if LHC was part of Fulcaneli double "C", unfortunately the bad behavior by some in Zurich never let the Drs. explain Fulcaneli. Excellent article thanks for posting Peace Papa T[/quote] Hiya Papa T... At the moment I'm searching the archives for Dan's comments on the LHC and will post them when I find them .. In the meantime ... Here's another Physics article about the time paradox issues with the LHC .. Test of Influence from Future in Large Hadron Collider; A Proposal[/SIZE] Authors: Holger B. Nielsen, Masao Ninomiya (Submitted on 21 Feb 2008 (v1), last revised 11 Jul 2008 (this version, v2)) FULL ARTICLE AVAILABLE AT LINK BELOW[/SIZE] arxiv.org/abs/0802.2991Abstract: We have earlier proposed the idea of making card drawing experiment of which outcome potentially decides whether Large Hadron Collider (LHC for short) should be closed or not. The purpose is to test theoretical models which, like e.g. our own model that has an imaginary part of the action with much a similar form to that of the real part. The imaginary part has influence on the initial conditions not only in the past but even from the future. It was speculated that all accelerators producing large amounts of Higgs particles like the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC for short) would call for initial conditions to have been so arranged as to finally not allow these accelerators to come to work. If there were such effects we could perhaps provoke a very clear cut "miracle" by having the effect make the drawn card be the one closing LHC. Here we shall, however, discuss that a total closing is hardly needed and seek to calculate how one could perform checking experiment for the proposed type of influence from future to be made in the statistically least disturbing and least harmful way. We shall also discuss how to extract most information about our effect or model in the unlikely case that a card restricting the running of LHC or the Tevatron would be drawn at all, by estimating say the relative importance of high beam energy or of high luminosity for the purpose of our effect.
|
|
|
Post by fr33ksh0w2012 on Oct 17, 2009 12:35:58 GMT 4
I found this to be most interesting. I remember when the LHC was about to start up and some of the population was all a buzzz that the end of the world was near. Time travelers Hmmmmmm What if a particular time traveler already knew what would happen, told someone, and that someone would have warned us if it would/could go wrong. After all, we were warned of what would happen if the LG's were not shut down, and we were warned of a certain catastrophe is we humans didn't get our act together. (picture posted in hideway )) I am left wondering if LHC was part of Fulcaneli double "C", unfortunately the bad behavior by some in Zurich never let the Drs. explain Fulcaneli. Excellent article thanks for posting Peace Papa THiya Papa T... At the moment I'm searching the archives for Dan's comments on the LHC and will post them when I find them .. In the meantime ... Here's another Physics article about the time paradox issues with the LHC .. Test of Influence from Future in Large Hadron Collider; A Proposal[/SIZE] Authors: Holger B. Nielsen, Masao Ninomiya (Submitted on 21 Feb 2008 (v1), last revised 11 Jul 2008 (this version, v2)) FULL ARTICLE AVAILABLE AT LINK BELOW[/SIZE] arxiv.org/abs/0802.2991Abstract: We have earlier proposed the idea of making card drawing experiment of which outcome potentially decides whether Large Hadron Collider (LHC for short) should be closed or not. The purpose is to test theoretical models which, like e.g. our own model that has an imaginary part of the action with much a similar form to that of the real part. The imaginary part has influence on the initial conditions not only in the past but even from the future. It was speculated that all accelerators producing large amounts of Higgs particles like the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC for short) would call for initial conditions to have been so arranged as to finally not allow these accelerators to come to work. If there were such effects we could perhaps provoke a very clear cut "miracle" by having the effect make the drawn card be the one closing LHC. Here we shall, however, discuss that a total closing is hardly needed and seek to calculate how one could perform checking experiment for the proposed type of influence from future to be made in the statistically least disturbing and least harmful way. We shall also discuss how to extract most information about our effect or model in the unlikely case that a card restricting the running of LHC or the Tevatron would be drawn at all, by estimating say the relative importance of high beam energy or of high luminosity for the purpose of our effect.[/quote] Sounds to me as if they are trying to RIP A HOLE IN TIME *THE FUTURE PEOPLE WON'T LET THEM DO IT* THAT IS THE REAL REASON THAT THEY MADE THE Large Hadron Collider OUR PEOPLE FROM THE FUTURE WON'T LET THEM DO IT BECAUSE THE "SCIENTISTS" ARE TOO IRRESPONSIBLE AND IT WILL MESS THE TIMELINES AGAIN IT'S A CASE OF THE SCIENCE OF STUPIDITY SCIENTISTS ACTUALLY HAVE A LOW I.Q. A LOT OF THINGS WILL ESCAPE THE FUTURE TIME AND COME HERE BAD THINGS!
|
|
|
Post by galaxygirl on Oct 17, 2009 16:03:17 GMT 4
Hey fr33ksh0w2012 . . . re: Maybe it's not the people from the future who are interfering with this little project . . . . . it might JUST be those pesky cherubim again ;D GG
|
|
|
Post by iris on Oct 17, 2009 17:39:05 GMT 4
Thank you for ALL of You for the great arcticles.
We don't know too much. Maybe Dr Dan knows what those ribbons are marking. Maybe God just made the ribbons as a marking line, something like when the police close down a crime scene and say it: "This is it!" No tresspassing through those ribbons." Probably we don't know what code is necessary to those ribbons.
Lots of love, Iris
|
|
|
Post by emeraldsun on Oct 18, 2009 1:05:49 GMT 4
THE GREAT MOON BOMBING Ken Welch in Houston Oct. 15, 2009
Many of our readers are asking about the implications of the Moon bombing, and well they should! It's a pretty strange event any way you look at it. Worse yet, NASA's credibility is so bad that we don't know if the bombing even took place. So what's going on?
I think that the organization that owns and runs our secret space program has had 50 years or more to copy and perhaps even improve on alien-based hardware and weapons, and they are just itching to take another crack at E.T. After all, treaties only last until the next war. The problem is that a new war with alien races is not going to be confined to the moon, and it will not be possible to do it in secret again.
I would say the Moon-bombing is the kick-off of a campaign designed to get public enthusiasm stirred up for going back to the Moon. We'll be told that plenty of water was discovered, so a moon base is now feasible. Of course we may already have a moon base, permitted by some provision of the NAIA peace treaty that we don't know about. It might be what Buzz Aldrin called the "earth dome."
But that will remain secret, as will the sordid history we've just exposed in our recent Moon reports. There is no way that they want people to know that we already nuked members of an alien society who have been living on the Moon for quite some time.
So l'll bet that within the next few weeks you'll see Congress being pushed to provide NASA with the funding to "go to the Moon again." Once we send a new ship of some kind, and it reports being molested by nasty Aliens, the public will easily be swayed to accept war with E.T.
After all, it's our Moon, isn't it? Apparently, our black ops Space Navy thinks they might win this time. Or do they? The knowledge of hostile aliens may create greater support for Big Brother government (one world govt.?) pretty much as predicted in the famous Report From Iron Mountain. In fact, the more I think about this, the more interesting that idea becomes.
So the upside is that if you are one of those who always wanted to have a really good UFO sighting, in a couple years you may see them zipping right over your neighborhood while your neighbors take potshots at them. Shortly after I began taking my first look at the Apollo 11 material, Cliff High, of the linguistics web-bot project you are always hearing about, reported that just such a scenario was showing up on the horizon of the mass unconscious mind. Our project and their project are generally complimentary and we often end up tracking the same themes.
How will it all turn out? Well, that's beyond the limits of our reversed speech technology, and your guess is just as good as mine. But one way or another, E.T. is going to move from fiction to reality and life on planet Earth will become a lot more interesting.
KEN
ken-welch.com
|
|
|
Post by emeraldsun on Oct 18, 2009 3:05:11 GMT 4
|
|
|
Post by fr33ksh0w2012 on Oct 18, 2009 3:17:46 GMT 4
THE GREAT MOON BOMBING Ken Welch in Houston Oct. 15, 2009 Many of our readers are asking about the implications of the Moon bombing, and well they should! It's a pretty strange event any way you look at it. Worse yet, NASA's credibility is so bad that we don't know if the bombing even took place. So what's going on? I think that the organization that owns and runs our secret space program has had 50 years or more to copy and perhaps even improve on alien-based hardware and weapons, and they are just itching to take another crack at E.T. After all, treaties only last until the next war. The problem is that a new war with alien races is not going to be confined to the moon, and it will not be possible to do it in secret again. I would say the Moon-bombing is the kick-off of a campaign designed to get public enthusiasm stirred up for going back to the Moon. We'll be told that plenty of water was discovered, so a moon base is now feasible. Of course we may already have a moon base, permitted by some provision of the NAIA peace treaty that we don't know about. It might be what Buzz Aldrin called the "earth dome." But that will remain secret, as will the sordid history we've just exposed in our recent Moon reports. There is no way that they want people to know that we already nuked members of an alien society who have been living on the Moon for quite some time. So l'll bet that within the next few weeks you'll see Congress being pushed to provide NASA with the funding to "go to the Moon again." Once we send a new ship of some kind, and it reports being molested by nasty Aliens, the public will easily be swayed to accept war with E.T. After all, it's our Moon, isn't it? Apparently, our black ops Space Navy thinks they might win this time. Or do they? The knowledge of hostile aliens may create greater support for Big Brother government (one world govt.?) pretty much as predicted in the famous Report From Iron Mountain. In fact, the more I think about this, the more interesting that idea becomes. So the upside is that if you are one of those who always wanted to have a really good UFO sighting, in a couple years you may see them zipping right over your neighborhood while your neighbors take potshots at them. Shortly after I began taking my first look at the Apollo 11 material, Cliff High, of the linguistics web-bot project you are always hearing about, reported that just such a scenario was showing up on the horizon of the mass unconscious mind. Our project and their project are generally complimentary and we often end up tracking the same themes. How will it all turn out? Well, that's beyond the limits of our reversed speech technology, and your guess is just as good as mine. But one way or another, E.T. is going to move from fiction to reality and life on planet Earth will become a lot more interesting. KEN ken-welch.com AWW... NOO...! AWW... NOO...!
|
|