|
Post by Eagles Disobey on Sept 29, 2010 17:25:29 GMT 4
"Is Dan just praying during this time? You said the website would be dedicated to Al Fast Thunder until October 24."No, he's not just praying. His position is 24/7. That's why he wears no watch. EAGLES DISOBEY! [/b] news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100929/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_palestiniansp.s. Many have aked what Dan has done most since being sworn into the position he now holds with Marci? Most of the time? He has been working for the People. He has also has been memorizing archives. Archives such as for the origins and secrets of the Freemasons. He wants answers.[/quote] btw an update about Dan's grooming of a personal student, who had been accepted under his wing, who possesses two Master's degrees, and was from a suburb Mexico City: they have parted professional ways, their teacher-student relationship has been terminated. It's nothing having to do with anything involving science, it has to do with religious issues. The student is from a Traditional Conservative Catholic family. Difficulties began when dealing with the metaphysical aspects of Dan's grand synthesis theory and although these aspects were warned ahead if time, the person felt he could not continue. Dan accepted the person's position and problem with cheer, and they parted amicably. So, Dan is once again in waiting for a student. The right one will come along.
|
|
|
Post by ninathedog on Sept 30, 2010 1:41:44 GMT 4
"Is Dan just praying during this time? You said the website would be dedicated to Al Fast Thunder until October 24."No, he's not just praying. His position is 24/7. That's why he wears no watch. EAGLES DISOBEY! [/b] news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100929/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_palestiniansp.s. Many have aked what Dan has done most since being sworn into the position he now holds with Marci? Most of the time? He has been working for the People. He has also has been memorizing archives. Archives such as for the origins and secrets of the Freemasons. He wants answers.[/quote] I hope Dan will be willing to share his assessments.... Please?
|
|
|
Post by ninathedog on Sept 30, 2010 1:45:05 GMT 4
Gold rush on the Gulf: Researchers clamor for cash
By Seth Borenstein And John Flesher, Associated Press Writers – Wed Sep 29, 2:37 pm ET NEW ORLEANS – Once a backwater in the world of oceanographic research, the Gulf of Mexico has suddenly become the site of a scientific gold rush, all because of the BP oil spill. The environmental disaster represents a once-in-a-generation research opportunity that has oceanographers salivating. There's big money — $500 million from BP alone — up for grabs. And for scientists who usually toil in near-obscurity, there's the prospect of lots of media attention. Researchers are suddenly in demand, with more than 100 hired guns on the job. BP has signed up nearly 50 scientists to help defend it from legal action. The federal government has its paid experts, and so do attorneys suing BP. Environmental activists have their own research vessels and scientists. At least 165 proposed studies are registered through a federal clearinghouse. Some crucial supplies — such as boats — are hard to find. "We've never had this many research vessels concentrated in the Gulf at any one time — never," said Larry McKinney, director of Gulf of Mexico studies at Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi. "It's been a flat-out crazy time." To try to bring order to what's going on, scientists studying the spill from around the country will gather in Florida on Oct. 5 at the request of the White House science office to talk about coordination and priorities. Also in the next week or so, Gulf states are expected to complete an agreement on how to hand out the $500 million in BP-pledged research money over the next decade. The Gulf of Mexico has gotten relatively little federal research support in the past. In the 20 years before the oil spill, the Great Lakes received more than $1 billion, while the Chesapeake Bay got just shy of half a billion. Spending for the same time period on the much-larger Gulf of Mexico: $85 million. "It's the hardest working of our ocean basins, but it's the most underfunded in terms of research monitoring and science," said Florida State University oceanographer Ian MacDonald. That's changing because of the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history. Hour after hour on a hot and windy September day, biologist Eric Hoffmayer bounced over choppy Gulf waters in a fishing boat, hunting for whale sharks — one species among many that scientists are studying to measure how the spill has affected people and the environment. Hoffmayer, of the University of Southern Mississippi's Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, is among the fortunate scholars who have snagged funding. He has had more luck landing money than whale sharks, at least on this outing, when none turned up. "There's multiple sources of funding out there. You just have to know how to tap into it," Hoffmayer said. Two major types of research are taking place, and they often get confused by the public. One involves basic inquiries into questions such as where the oil has gone and what it means for the ecosystem, food web and public health. That is where BP has pledged to spend a half-billion dollars, with all findings to be made publicly available. The other type of research supports the federal government's natural resource damage assessment, or NRDA, a part of the legal battle that eventually will determine how much money BP will pay for restoration. In the NRDA process, both sides have hired experts and pledged them to secrecy. "It is standard practice to ask such a litigation expert to maintain the confidentiality of communications with legal counsel," BP spokesman Tom Mueller wrote in an e-mail. Likewise, the government may keep some data in this process secret, said Steve Murawski, chief fisheries scientist for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. NOAA has 17 damage assessment teams working the spill, he said. Under the 1990 oil spill law written after the Exxon Valdez disaster, both sides hire scientists, economists and attorneys and collect data in a legal process designed to "make the public whole" for loss of natural resources. Billions of dollars are at stake with court fights likely to go on for years. But that's only a fraction of the research that's going on, scientists said. It's the general research money — including BP's half-billion — that most are seeking. The only stipulation from BP is "the data is shared publicly when the results are in," Mueller said. Researchers and deans at several universities confirmed this. "At one point I was sorely tempted to give the money back because frankly I didn't want the sea lab associated with BP money," said Dauphin Island Sea Lab director George Crozier. But when he saw there were no strings, he accepted the money. So far, $40 million of it has been given to four large academic institutions in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida and the National Institutes of Health, which then divided it among dozens of researchers. In Florida, 233 proposals competed for $10 million in grants with only 27 getting funded. The Gulf of Mexico Alliance, a consortium of state officials, is setting up a more permanent process for distributing the remaining $460 million from BP. Some say still more is needed. "I don't think $50 million a year is enough to study the problem as we know the scope of it," NOAA's Murawski said. Environmental groups are getting into the act. Greenpeace dispatched its 164-foot research ship Arctic Sunrise for a three-month tour of the Gulf, where it is hosting university scientists for a variety of spill-related studies and collecting water samples. The funding scramble has created a geographical rift. Scientists in the Gulf region contend they should get most of the money because they know the area better and have been shortchanged in the past. Those from elsewhere say grants should be awarded on the basis of researchers' credentials and the worthiness of their study proposals. "It's in our backyard," said William Hawkins, director of Southern Mississippi's Gulf Coast lab. Many scientists in Gulf states believe "this is our time, this is our spill," he added. There's a sense of urgency behind the push for funding. Ideally, scientists would have taken measurements before, during and after the spill to see how the ecosystem changed. Their efforts were hampered for months by a shortage of vessels and poor access to the spill area as the government and BP focused on plugging the leak. Now, the oil is becoming harder to find with each passing day. Chris D'Elia, dean of Louisiana State University's School of the Coast and the Environment, said: "This is like trying to do forensic work on a very old crime scene — the murder occurred months ago, the body's decayed and animals walked off with the rest." ___ Flesher reported from New Orleans, Borenstein from Washington. ___ Online: NOAA's oil spill science missions home page: tinyurl.com/noaabpstudiesSea Grant program's overall database of oil spill research: tinyurl.com/gomstudiesBP's Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative: tinyurl.com/25h5olkInterior Dept.'s Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration Program restoration.doi.govnews.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100929/ap_on_sc/us_sci_gulf_oil_spill_research
|
|
|
Post by ninathedog on Sept 30, 2010 2:15:30 GMT 4
New Earth-like planet discovered
Gliese 581g in 'Goldilocks zone' of space where liquid water could exist is strong contender for a habitable world Ian Sample, science correspondent guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 29 September 2010 22.00 BSTAn artist's impression of Gliese 581g, which astronomers say is near Earth — relatively speaking — at 120 trillion miles. Photograph: Zina Deretsky, National Science Foundation/APAstronomers have discovered a potentially habitable planet of similar size to Earth in orbit around a nearby star. A team of planet hunters spotted the alien world circling a red dwarf star called Gliese 581, 20 light years away. The planet is in the "Goldilocks zone" of space around a star where surface temperatures are neither too hot nor too cold for liquid water to form. "Our findings offer a very compelling case for a potentially habitable planet," said Steven Vogt, an astronomer at the University of California, Santa Cruz. "The fact that we were able to detect this planet so quickly and so nearby tells us that planets like this must be really common." If confirmed, the planet would be the most Earth-like that has ever been discovered in another solar system and the first strong contender for a habitable one. More than 400 exoplanets have been discovered by astronomers, but most are gas giants, like Jupiter, that would be inhospitable to life as we know it. Astronomers used the Keck telescope in Hawaii to study the movement of Gliese 581 in exquisite detail and from their observations inferred the presence of a number of orbiting planets. The team report two new planets in the Astrophysical Journal, bringing the total number known to be circling the star to six. One of the planets, named Gliese 581g, has a mass of three to four times that of Earth and takes 37 days to orbit the star. Astronomers believe it is a rocky planet with enough gravity to retain an atmosphere. Unlike the previously discovered planets, Gliese 581g lies squarely in the region of space were life can thrive. "We had planets on both sides of the habitable zone — one too hot and one too cold — and now we have one in the middle that's just right," Vogt said. One side of the planet is always facing the star, much as one side of the moon constantly faces Earth. This means that the far side of the planet is constantly in darkness. The most habitable region of the planet would be the line between the light and dark regions. "Any emerging life forms would have a wide range of stable climates to choose from and to evolve around, depending on their longitude," Vogt said. The average temperature on the planet is estimated to be between -31 to -12C, but the ground temperature would vary from blazing hot on the bright side and freezing on the dark side. "The number of systems with potentially habitable planets is probably on the order of 10 or 20 percent, and when you multiply that by the hundreds of billions of stars in the Milky Way, that's a large number. There could be tens of billions of these systems in our galaxy," said Vogt. www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/sep/29/earth-like-planet-gliese-581g
|
|
|
Post by Eagles Disobey on Sept 30, 2010 19:59:07 GMT 4
Eagles Disobey has two public advisories it wishes to make: 1. The materials from the July "Orb of the Ages" destruction have/are being mailed to those expecting rocks and related materials. Some were mailed minutes ago. 2. Drs. Dan and Marci recently had a private discussion with a rather high-ranking UFO researcher. Two elements of that discussion have been deemed important for full public disclosure by Eagles Disobey. (This material may be blogged on in the Eagles Disobey "ufology disclosure" blog, for those of you who are part of that.) During a conversation where the account of the truth (as presented on OMtv - BUT NOT INVOLVING OMTV) could be brought to the wider public, the UFO researcher (unnamed at this time - AND NOT INVOLVED WITH OMTV) asked both Drs. Dan and Marci: "How much of the truth of your account would you be willing to sacrifice to bring it to a wider audience?" (You read that right. ) Both Drs. Dan and Marci reacted at the same time, with "None of it!" (Dan), "Not any! No!" (Marci) then glanced over at each other, both because they had reacted simultaneously and so quickly! ;D We're not surprised. During the same meeting, the person, in the context of the discussion of the ufologist who broke into a nuclear missile silo site wearing a cape and a headdress, asked Dr. Dan if he could assist anyone in the "breaking into" (those were the words used) of S4? Dr. Dan, who possesses the sufficient intimate security information replied, "I would not assist in the breaking into of any National Defense Facility. Papoose is a National Defense Facility. The answer would be, 'no'!" The person asking him said, "Yes, it's one of them." Marci then said that neither of them would help. The direction of the conversation was then changed. No further was disclosed about such an idea, if it was more than a whim. Dr. Dan did report the conversation to those around him, and Dr. Marci did the same with her loop. EAGLES DISOBEY!
|
|
|
Post by Eagles Disobey on Sept 30, 2010 20:00:25 GMT 4
"Is Dan just praying during this time? You said the website would be dedicated to Al Fast Thunder until October 24."No, he's not just praying. His position is 24/7. That's why he wears no watch. EAGLES DISOBEY! [/b] news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100929/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_palestiniansp.s. Many have aked what Dan has done most since being sworn into the position he now holds with Marci? Most of the time? He has been working for the People. He has also has been memorizing archives. Archives such as for the origins and secrets of the Freemasons. He wants answers.[/quote] I hope Dan will be willing to share his assessments.... Please? [/quote] I'll ask him. (Frank)
|
|
|
Post by stan on Sept 30, 2010 21:00:05 GMT 4
Eagles Disobey has two public advisories it wishes to make: 1. The materials from the July "Orb of the Ages" destruction have/are being mailed to those expecting rocks and related materials. Some were mailed minutes ago. 2. Drs. Dan and Marci recently had a private discussion with a rather high-ranking UFO researcher. Two elements of that discussion have been deemed important for full public disclosure by Eagles Disobey. (This material may be blogged on in the Eagles Disobey "ufology disclosure" blog, for those of you who are part of that.) During a conversation where the account of the truth (as presented on OMtv - BUT NOT INVOLVING OMTV) could be brought to the wider public, the UFO researcher (unnamed at this time - AND NOT INVOLVED WITH OMTV) asked both Drs. Dan and Marci: "How much of the truth of your account would you be willing to sacrifice to bring it to a wider audience?" (You read that right. ) Both Drs. Dan and Marci reacted at the same time, with "None of it!" (Dan), "Not any! No!" (Marci) then glanced over at each other, both because they had reacted simultaneously and so quickly! ;D We're not surprised. During the same meeting, the person, in the context of the discussion of the ufologist who broke into a nuclear missile silo site wearing a cape and a headdress, asked Dr. Dan if he could assist anyone in the "breaking into" (those were the words used) of S4? Dr. Dan, who possesses the sufficient intimate security information replied, "I would not assist in the breaking into of any National Defense Facility. Papoose is a National Defense Facility. The answer would be, 'no'!" The person asking him said, "Yes, it's one of them." Marci then said that neither of them would help. The direction of the conversation was then changed. No further was disclosed about such an idea, if it was more than a whim. Dr. Dan did report the conversation to those around him, and Dr. Marci did the same with her loop. EAGLES DISOBEY! What we are learning from ufology for free, and about their mindset, couldn't be purchased at a premium! ;D The researcher said that he has been making tons of money off his "brand" because his people manage his PR carefully, and that D and M have been losing tons of money because they have refused to allow themselves to be managed likewise. When D and M advised him that they weren't to be managed and that the truth is the totality of what they've come to the public to tell the public, it was as if a burnt circuit overtook the man's behavior! He became frustrated and said that they were a legend, and that legend could be exchanged for real profits! When D responded "We're not here for profits, we're only here to tell the truth as unambiguously ordered in the October 12, 2005 orders." the "burnt circuit" became worse and he leaned back and grabbed the sides of his head and said this is so frustrating! It is becoming clear that to ufology, truth is second to anything that brings profits. truly,..
|
|
|
Post by Eagles Disobey on Sept 30, 2010 21:20:13 GMT 4
Eagles Disobey has two public advisories it wishes to make: 1. The materials from the July "Orb of the Ages" destruction have/are being mailed to those expecting rocks and related materials. Some were mailed minutes ago. 2. Drs. Dan and Marci recently had a private discussion with a rather high-ranking UFO researcher. Two elements of that discussion have been deemed important for full public disclosure by Eagles Disobey. (This material may be blogged on in the Eagles Disobey "ufology disclosure" blog, for those of you who are part of that.) During a conversation where the account of the truth (as presented on OMtv - BUT NOT INVOLVING OMTV) could be brought to the wider public, the UFO researcher (unnamed at this time - AND NOT INVOLVED WITH OMTV) asked both Drs. Dan and Marci: "How much of the truth of your account would you be willing to sacrifice to bring it to a wider audience?" (You read that right. ) Both Drs. Dan and Marci reacted at the same time, with "None of it!" (Dan), "Not any! No!" (Marci) then glanced over at each other, both because they had reacted simultaneously and so quickly! ;D We're not surprised. During the same meeting, the person, in the context of the discussion of the ufologist who broke into a nuclear missile silo site wearing a cape and a headdress, asked Dr. Dan if he could assist anyone in the "breaking into" (those were the words used) of S4? Dr. Dan, who possesses the sufficient intimate security information replied, "I would not assist in the breaking into of any National Defense Facility. Papoose is a National Defense Facility. The answer would be, 'no'!" The person asking him said, "Yes, it's one of them." Marci then said that neither of them would help. The direction of the conversation was then changed. No further was disclosed about such an idea, if it was more than a whim. Dr. Dan did report the conversation to those around him, and Dr. Marci did the same with her loop. EAGLES DISOBEY! What we are learning from ufology for free, and about their mindset, couldn't be purchased at a premium! ;D The researcher said that he has been making tons of money off his "brand" because his people manage his PR carefully, and that D and M have been losing tons of money because they have refused to allow themselves to be managed likewise. When D and M advised him that they weren't to be managed and that the truth is the totality of what they've come to the public to tell the public, it was as if a burnt circuit overtook the man's behavior! He became frustrated and said that they were a legend, and that legend could be exchanged for real profits! When D responded "We're not here for profits, we're only here to tell the truth as unambiguously ordered in the October 12, 2005 orders." the "burnt circuit" became worse and he leaned back and grabbed the sides of his head and said this is so frustrating! It is becoming clear that to ufology, truth is second to anything that brings profits. truly,.. We need, per D and M, to decrease even our comments, in honor of Al Fast Thunder's passing, but.. We have been asked if ARGGO has been stopped, and if not, where the team is in its work? No, it is proceeding normally. The central cylinder component is being worked on, and D is in the middle of haggling over the prices for some very powerful and large neodymium magnets of different sizes and shapes. That's all we can say, but.. IT'S ONGOING, WILL TAKE TIME, AND WILL BE FINISHED. THIS IS EAGLES DISOBEY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE, NOT YOUR AVERAGE UFOLOGY CLAIMER. JUST LOOK AT ISIS, IT WILL BE SEEN AT FT. McDOWELL. JUST LIKE WE SAID. (Yes, Eagles knew of Al Fast Thunder's passing, and delayed the statement from us. The Lakota have precious religious rites they conduct on the passing of someone as important as Al. We stepped back in silence and respect to not even have our voices heard for awhile.) EAGLES DISOBEY! P.S. Letters continue to pile into DANBURISCH@YAHOO.COM. THEY ARE NOT ACTIVELY REVIEWED. THAT EMAIL ADDRESS IS CLOSED. THE ONLY ADDRESS THEY ARE REVIEWED IN IS FMGO_EAGLES@YAHOO.COM.
|
|
|
Post by Eagles Disobey on Sept 30, 2010 22:28:03 GMT 4
What we are learning from ufology for free, and about their mindset, couldn't be purchased at a premium! ;D The researcher said that he has been making tons of money off his "brand" because his people manage his PR carefully, and that D and M have been losing tons of money because they have refused to allow themselves to be managed likewise. When D and M advised him that they weren't to be managed and that the truth is the totality of what they've come to the public to tell the public, it was as if a burnt circuit overtook the man's behavior! He became frustrated and said that they were a legend, and that legend could be exchanged for real profits! When D responded "We're not here for profits, we're only here to tell the truth as unambiguously ordered in the October 12, 2005 orders." the "burnt circuit" became worse and he leaned back and grabbed the sides of his head and said this is so frustrating! It is becoming clear that to ufology, truth is second to anything that brings profits. truly,.. We need, per D and M, to decrease even our comments, in honor of Al Fast Thunder's passing, but.. We have been asked if ARGGO has been stopped, and if not, where the team is in its work? No, it is proceeding normally. The central cylinder component is being worked on, and D is in the middle of haggling over the prices for some very powerful and large neodymium magnets of different sizes and shapes. That's all we can say, but.. IT'S ONGOING, WILL TAKE TIME, AND WILL BE FINISHED. THIS IS EAGLES DISOBEY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE, NOT YOUR AVERAGE UFOLOGY CLAIMER. JUST LOOK AT ISIS, IT WILL BE SEEN AT FT. McDOWELL. JUST LIKE WE SAID. (Yes, Eagles knew of Al Fast Thunder's passing, and delayed the statement from us. The Lakota have precious religious rites they conduct on the passing of someone as important as Al. We stepped back in silence and respect to not even have our voices heard for awhile.) EAGLES DISOBEY! P.S. Letters continue to pile into DANBURISCH@YAHOO.COM. THEY ARE NOT ACTIVELY REVIEWED. THAT EMAIL ADDRESS IS CLOSED. THE ONLY ADDRESS THEY ARE REVIEWED IN IS FMGO_EAGLES@YAHOO.COM. 2 letters were received at fmgo_eagles asking, then why were they talking with that guy to begin with? Good question. They know him and he led the request for a conversation with the statements that he had much to "tell them" and that he'd be in town (Vegas). That much to tell them never arrived, unless telling them that they weren't making enough money off the truth was the "much?" Dan also thought that if the person was taking a high road maybe he'd be interested in something like Dan's earlier "Lotus Blossoms" idea? Of course, that idea was never raised by Dan during the conversation because the man was too busy talking about money, and money they could make, throughout it. Too bad.
|
|
|
Post by forevernyt on Oct 1, 2010 0:49:36 GMT 4
It's sad. That person, not knowing who it is, probably started his research in a very earnest and honest way. Then through the years, and probably low funds, found a way to supplement his income though profit gaining ideas. Then the profit became the end goal, not the information. Greed corrupts.
Maybe one day, this person will come back to the path of honesty and truth.
One can hope.
Kudos to the Doctors for handling it the way they did, not that we would have expected them to do otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by ninathedog on Oct 1, 2010 19:49:48 GMT 4
'Feds radiating Americans'? Mobile X-ray vans hit US streetsThe Christian Science Monitor By Patrik Jonsson Patrik Jonsson – Wed Sep 29, 7:45 pm ETAtlanta – For many living in a terror-spooked country, it might seem like a great government innovation: Use vans equipped with mobile X-ray units to scan vehicles at major sporting events, or even randomly, for bombs or contraband. But news that the US is buying custom-made vans packed with something called backscatter X-ray capacity has riled privacy advocates and sparked internet worries about "feds radiating Americans." "This really trips up the creep factor because it's one of those things that you sort of intrinsically think the government shouldn't be doing," says Vermont-based privacy expert Frederick Lane, author of "American Privacy." "But, legally, the issue is the boundary between the government's legitimate security interest and privacy expectations we enjoy in our cars." American Science & Engineering, a Billerica, Mass.-company, tells Forbes it's sold more than 500 ZBVs, or Z Backscatter Vans, to US and foreign governments. The Department of Defense has bought the most for war zone use, but US law enforcement has also deployed the vans to search for bombs inside the US, according to Joe Reiss, a company spokesman, as quoted by Forbes. On Tuesday, a counterterror operation snarled truck traffic on I-20 near Atlanta, where Department of Homeland Security teams used mobile X-ray technology to check the contents of truck trailers. Authorities said the inspections weren't prompted by any specific threat. The mobile X-ray technology works by bouncing narrow X-ray streams off an object like a car and then analyzing the scatter rate of the returning rays. Operators can then locate less-dense objects that could be bodies or bombs. Backscatter X-ray is already part of an ongoing national debate about its use in so-called full body scanners being deployed in many US airports. In that case, US officials have said they will not store or share the images and will use masking technology to avoid revealing details of the human body. Nevertheless, information security advocates have filed suit to stop their deployment, citing concerns about privacy. Security experts say expanding the X-ray technology for use on American streets is a powerful counterterror strategy. They also point out the images do not not offer the kind of detail that would be embarrasing to anyone. Moreover, law enforcement already has broad search-and-seizure powers on public highways, where a search warrant is often not needed for officers to instigate a physical search. But others worry that radiating Americans without their knowledge is evidence of gradually eroding constitutional protections in the post-9/11 age. "Regardless of where you fall on the spectrum of national security … you have to be realistic that this is another way in which the government is capturing information they may lose control over," says Mr. Lane. "I just have some real problems with the idea of even beginning a campaign of rolling surveillance of American citizens, which is what this essentially is." news.yahoo.com/s/csm/329052
|
|
|
Post by ninathedog on Oct 1, 2010 21:27:43 GMT 4
Jeffrey Smith - Seeds of Deception & The Danger of Genetically Engineered FoodsSeptember 30, 2010 Red Ice Creationsone hour interview LISTEN:www.redicecreations.com/radio/2010/09sep/RIR-100930.phpWe have Jeffrey Smith with us on the program to talk about his bestselling books "Seeds of Deception" and "Genetic Roulette". Jeffrey has been exposing the shocking facts about how genetically modified organisms have entered our lives with the aid of government and corporations like Monsanto. He links GMO to toxins, allergies, infertility, infant mortality, immune dysfunction, stunted growth, cancer and death. Listen to this one hour program to learn more about the research and studies that prove that genetically modified foods are detrimental to your health, what foods you need to avoid and how genetically engineered plants now are contaminating the natural biosphere. Topics discussed: GMO, FDA, Dr. Arpad Pusztai, Project Censored, Monsanto, Robert Shapiro, Obama's Green Revolution in Africa, Michael Taylor, The Global Seed Vault, GMO Labeling, Corn Syrup, EU Rules, Genes, Animal Testing, Roundup Ready Corn, "Roundup Ready Gut Bacteria", Contamination, GMO Salmon and "Frankenfish". www.redicecreations.com/radio/2010/09sep/RIR-100930.php
|
|
|
Post by Eagles Disobey on Oct 2, 2010 13:05:39 GMT 4
Quoted from blog: " As I explained to our friend, people can go anywhere and get George Lucas Industrial Lights and Magic stuff. That's what people do when they have to make something out of nothing. I suppose we are the exact opposite of what most people expect. With all those people shoving themselves into the limelight with whatever little bit of tinfoil they found (and think is a piece of a UFO) or with whatever stunt they managed to pull off (like dressing up in a blue cape and feather head-dress with crystals hot-glued to the headband while breaking into a national defense facility for the sheer publicity), I guess people think that we should fall into line with that rabble, hoping to gather some attention from the masses. Sheesh. I finally told him that I didn't give a crap whether people believed anything we are telling them. The truth isn't affected one way or the other by what somebody believes about it. " Read all of Dr. Marci's comments on the blog UFOlogydisclosure ufologydisclosure.blogspot.com/2010/10/how-much-of-truth-is-worth-preserving.html
|
|
|
Post by ninathedog on Oct 2, 2010 21:36:39 GMT 4
www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGAIJVk1028'Feds radiating Americans'? Mobile X-ray vans hit US streetsThe Christian Science Monitor By Patrik Jonsson Patrik Jonsson – Wed Sep 29, 7:45 pm ETAtlanta – For many living in a terror-spooked country, it might seem like a great government innovation: Use vans equipped with mobile X-ray units to scan vehicles at major sporting events, or even randomly, for bombs or contraband. But news that the US is buying custom-made vans packed with something called backscatter X-ray capacity has riled privacy advocates and sparked internet worries about "feds radiating Americans." "This really trips up the creep factor because it's one of those things that you sort of intrinsically think the government shouldn't be doing," says Vermont-based privacy expert Frederick Lane, author of "American Privacy." "But, legally, the issue is the boundary between the government's legitimate security interest and privacy expectations we enjoy in our cars." American Science & Engineering, a Billerica, Mass.-company, tells Forbes it's sold more than 500 ZBVs, or Z Backscatter Vans, to US and foreign governments. The Department of Defense has bought the most for war zone use, but US law enforcement has also deployed the vans to search for bombs inside the US, according to Joe Reiss, a company spokesman, as quoted by Forbes. On Tuesday, a counterterror operation snarled truck traffic on I-20 near Atlanta, where Department of Homeland Security teams used mobile X-ray technology to check the contents of truck trailers. Authorities said the inspections weren't prompted by any specific threat. The mobile X-ray technology works by bouncing narrow X-ray streams off an object like a car and then analyzing the scatter rate of the returning rays. Operators can then locate less-dense objects that could be bodies or bombs. Backscatter X-ray is already part of an ongoing national debate about its use in so-called full body scanners being deployed in many US airports. In that case, US officials have said they will not store or share the images and will use masking technology to avoid revealing details of the human body. Nevertheless, information security advocates have filed suit to stop their deployment, citing concerns about privacy. Security experts say expanding the X-ray technology for use on American streets is a powerful counterterror strategy. They also point out the images do not not offer the kind of detail that would be embarrasing to anyone. Moreover, law enforcement already has broad search-and-seizure powers on public highways, where a search warrant is often not needed for officers to instigate a physical search. But others worry that radiating Americans without their knowledge is evidence of gradually eroding constitutional protections in the post-9/11 age. "Regardless of where you fall on the spectrum of national security … you have to be realistic that this is another way in which the government is capturing information they may lose control over," says Mr. Lane. "I just have some real problems with the idea of even beginning a campaign of rolling surveillance of American citizens, which is what this essentially is." news.yahoo.com/s/csm/329052
|
|
|
Post by Eagles Disobey on Oct 3, 2010 6:08:01 GMT 4
Bacje wrote a comment to Dr. Marci's blog. "Thank you Marci for sharing this. Over a couple of years I learned a lot from you and Dan about what is real integrity and care for the others. I am shocked that a person that was relatively close to you did not know who you are, and some of us, half world apart, have figured that out. You could perhaps make a contest of finding just one honest ufo researcher The winner would get nothing because truth, integrity and honesty have no price " We love that idea, [glow=red,2,300]A CONTEST to find just one honest UFO researcher![/glow] WTG Bacje!
|
|